1A few suggestions for promoting equity in school science education:.
1. Reduce syllabi considerably at all school levels.
Reduced
pressure of syllabi will give students more time to devote to fundamental concepts and skills
(measurements, drawing and interpreting graphs, etc.).
It is
well known to educationists that no worthwhile learning can take place if
students do not get time to pause, observe, reflect and imagine. We also want students to be able to apply the
knowledge that they acquire to unfamiliar situations. For this the thinking skills of students
must be sharpened. To do that they must
be given enough time. This entails that
the syllabi must be cut down.
Once
the fundamental concepts and skills are properly learnt, the rate of learning
can improve in higher classes, since college-going students can take higher
pressure. At present students going out of schools have neither grasped
fundamental concepts nor have they learned necessary skills.
Pruned syllabi will give more time to students from
weaker sections to cope with schoolwork, thereby helping promote equity.
In
any case, the conditions in India are so different from one part to another,
that it is not possible to imagine that all the schools in India can come up to
the same level of achievement. Keeping
equity in mind, it is necessary that the school syllabi at all level be pruned
considerably.
2.
Language of science books should be
simple.
If
language of books is difficult, science becomes doubly difficult. First, the student must comprehend the
language and then the concepts expressed in that language.
Every
writer of school textbooks should pause at each sentence and question herself,
maybe more than once, if she can replace this sentence by a simpler one. We cannot avoid technical terms, but we can
certainly strive to make the language
connecting these terms as simple as possible.
If
the students do not understand the written word, how would they understand
concepts of science expressed through these words? And if they do not understand concepts of
science, they would fall back upon rote learning, whereas our objective is to
make students think and be able to apply what they learn.
You
must have seen the reports that India is falling behind other nations in
innovations. Even much-admired IITs are
not doing very well when it comes to innovations. The reason is that the overall rate of
literacy is low and the quality of our ‘literates’ is quite poor.
Poor
language skills of textbook writers and that of students promote rote learning
. On top of that, there is little visual support in class rooms. The result is
that students stop thinking. They are
unable to apply their knowledge to unfamiliar situations. Under these circumstances, how can one think
of innovations?
One
hears complaints from some states (Uttrakhand, for example) that the language
of books translated into Hindi is quite difficult. My request to the lovers of Hindi and other
languages is that they should temper their enthusiasm for the language they
love and make the language of textbooks easy-to-understand and child - friendly.
The use of simple language makes subject matter accessible
to all and thereby contributes to equity.For full Power Point Presentation, visit: www.schoolscienceguru.com
No comments:
Post a Comment